Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Workshop on Business Models of R&D Digital Marketplaces

Authors: Goldbeck, Gerhard; Mogni, Gabriele; Simperler, Alexandra;

Workshop on Business Models of R&D Digital Marketplaces

Abstract

This workshop brought established businesses, start-ups and current EU projects together, and enabled discussions about the opportunities and challenges of digital marketplace business in the materials science space. Both the established and emerging marketplaces had in common that their main asset was to take barriers away, so that … Suppliers can find Buyers everywhere in the world Knowledge is made accessible to everyone who requires it Non-experts become enabled to do things that were traditionally only accessible to the experts The established marketplaces, Materials Square, OneAngstrom, IdeXlab and Matmatch do provide sophisticated infrastructure to enable this in a safe and stable environment. They offer simple payment options (often similar to plans provided by mobile phone providers) and give a transparent overview on service included. Support is provided to help suppliers to provide their products (APIs, etc.) and buyers are aided with how to operate the platforms. Marketplaces, that offer services to non-experts, offer information, training and case studies, to enable onboarding to an offered service. All these marketplaces had in common that they experienced and understood the barriers their buyers encounter, and they could reason well why their offerings can break these barriers. It is pertinent, to understand the market and gain business skills and investment to develop further. The EU marketplaces, VIMMP, MarketPlace, MARKET4.0, DOME4.0, and WeldGalaxy are in the fledgling stages of becoming business. However, they could convey why they are developing their platforms and who could profit how. When comparing the technical effort that feeds into developing a marketplace, we can see that a consortium can match a professional setting with ease. When it comes to marketing, we can see a gap open. In fairness, many H2020[1] projects lead to a technology readiness level (TRL)[2] too low to embark on the practical side of business. However, the theoretical side of business is well covered with documentation of key exploitable results, innovation continuation plans, and business models. During the workshop it became clear, that the EU projects need to invest time in finding users for their platforms and each member of the consortium shall involve their networks. The projects may have to identify persons who wish to carry the idea further and put all the effort in to move from idea/prototype to business. 3rd party funding of some sort will be necessary and potential investors will want to see evidence that a marketplace will work. [1] Horizon 2020 is the eighth framework programme funding research, technological development, and innovation, which ran from 2014–20. [2] https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-g-trl_en.pdf

This event happened online, March 25, 2021

Related Organizations
Keywords

Business Models, Materials Modelling, Virtual Marketplaces

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 16
    download downloads 10
  • 16
    views
    10
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
16
10
Green