Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Leitfaden für qualitätsfördernde Aspekte in der Medizin und Biomedizin

Authors: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft | AG \\"Qualität In Der Klinischen Forschung\\" Der SK Für Grundsatzfragen In Der Klinischen Forschung;

Leitfaden für qualitätsfördernde Aspekte in der Medizin und Biomedizin

Abstract

A working group of the DFG Senate Commission on Key Questions in Clinical Research has compiled the most important aspects that are relevant when describing research projects in the field of medical and biomedical research in order to ensure high quality and reproducibility of research results. This guideline is useful for project planning and implementation as well as for the review process. The DFG supports this subject-specific self-reflection of research processes and is in exchange with other funding organisations and research institutions for this purpose. Eine Arbeitsgruppe der DFG-Senatskommission für Grundsatzfragen in der Klinischen Forschung hat die wichtigsten Aspekte zusammengetragen, die bei der Beschreibung von Forschungsprojekten im Bereich der Medizin und Biomedizin relevant sind, um eine hohe Qualität und Reproduzierbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen sicherzustellen. Dieser Leitfaden kann bei der Planung und Beschreibung von Projekten sowie für die Begutachtung verwendet werden. Die DFG unterstützt diese fachspezifische Selbstreflexion von Forschungsprozessen und steht dazu im Austausch mit anderen Förderorganisationen und Forschungseinrichtungen.

Keywords

Qualitätssicherung, Replizierbarkeit, German Research Foundation, funding criteria, Medizin, quality assurance, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Biomedizin, clinical research, biomedical research, Reproduzierbarkeit, DFG, Förderkriterien, reproducibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 107
    download downloads 54
  • 107
    views
    54
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
107
54