Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This dataset contains the coding of content analysis of a sample of hoaxes debunked by three fact checkers in Spain (N = 533): Maldita.es (N = 327), Newtral (N = 143), and EFE Verifica (N = 63). Coding includes de following variables: 0. Subject of the hoax: science/health, politics/government, other. Platform used to spread the hoax: networks (in general), Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, YouTube, and others. Formats used: text, audio, image, video, other. Geographical scope: local, national, international, unspecified/not applicable. Type of hoax: joke, exaggeration, decontextualization, deception. Topic of hoaxes related to science/health: scientific research, scientific policy and health management, advice issued to the public, and others. Topic of hoaxes related to scientific research: origin of the virus, transmissibility, fatality rate, treatments, vaccines, etc. Source type: anonymous, spoofed, fictitious, real. Non-anonymous sources: members of the public, business, government, professional, healthcare/science. Type of healthcare/science sources: researchers, international scientific organizations, national scientific organizations, health professionals, and others.
Spain, Misinformation, Infodemics;, Hoaxes, Covid-19
Twitter Data
Spain, Misinformation, Infodemics;, Hoaxes, Covid-19
Twitter Data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 69 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts