Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract: In this qualitative analysis, the researcher explores The God Theory or Intelligent Design. While the atheist community continues to make the assertion that God does not exist through assertions such as there being no direct evidence for God, this analysis of existing research demonstrates the circumstantial case for God. Though some believe circumstantial evidence is not as strong as direct evidence, courts have often found it just as compelling. Hence, the circumstantial evidence from previous studies makes a compelling case for the existence of God. The first major point is that both spontaneous generation and abiogenesis have been proven impossible. This means that the only way life could arise by deduction is from another source of life. Another piece of evidence is that there are aspects to our existence that cannot be quantified yet are real without any doubt. As a result, one can certainly conclude rightly that miraculous events, which have been scientifically proven miraculous are attributable to an intelligent, conscious force, capable of acting deliberately and unable to be quantified or perceived through the senses. While these facts make a circumstantial case for God, the most compelling evidence is the fact that former atheists were converted and expressed the same theme; science and reasoning alone is insufficient to explain human existence as there are intangible elements, which add to the scientific to tell the whole story. When taken as a whole, this compellingly suggests the presence of a divine creator whom the theological community lovingly refers to as God.
Proof, God, Theory
Proof, God, Theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts