Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Haplostoma gracile Kim & Boxshall 2021, sp. nov.

Authors: Kim, Il-Hoi; Boxshall, Geoff A.;

Haplostoma gracile Kim & Boxshall 2021, sp. nov.

Abstract

Haplostoma gracile sp. nov. (Fig. 93) Type material. Holotype ♀ (MNHN-IU-2018-1994, as a whole mount on a slide) from ieptçclẚnẚdes sp.; New Caledonia, no other collection data. Etymology. The name is derived from the Latin gracẚl (=slender), referring to the elongate, vermiform body of the new species. Description of female. Body (Fig. 93A) extremely elongate, vermiform, straight, consisting of unsegmented trunk and small abdomen. Body 11 times longer than wide; length 3.25 mm and maximum width 286 μm, across region of leg 3. Cephalosome (Fig. 93B) obscurely defined from and narrower than metasome. Intervals between first to fourth legs 409, 614, 764 μm, respectively; distance from leg 4 to posterior tip of urosome 1182 μm. Genital apertures not seen. Abdomen (Fig. 93C) small, slightly longer than wide (116×103 μm), incompletely articulated from metasome, lacking any trace of segmentation, slightly narrowing posteriorly, with convex rear margin. Caudal ramus (Fig. 93C) as small semicircular lobe lacking caudal setae. Rostrum absent (Fig. 93B). Antennule (Fig. 93D) as transparent lobe, unsegmented and unarmed. Antenna (Fig. 93D) small, indistinctly 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, but well-sclerotized; distal segment short, armed with 4 equal, simple spines. Labrum small, slit-like, unornamented (Fig. 93B). Mandible, maxillule, and maxilla absent. Maxilliped (Fig. 93E, F) short, indistinctly segmented, tipped with small, simple, spiniform claw. Legs 1-4 adhering closely to ventral surface of metasome, extremely flattened dorsoventrally, not observable in anterior or posterior views; endopods not discernible. Exopods armed only with spines, lacking seta, ornamented with numerous minute spinules. Leg 1 (Fig. 93G) with 5 small bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 2 (Fig. 93H) with 1 small bifurcate spine on protopod and 4 bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 3 (Fig. 93I) with 4 bifurcate spines on exopod. Leg 4 armed as in leg 3. Legs 5 and 6 not discernible. Male. Unknown. Remarks. In having 5, 4, 4, and 4 spines, respectively, on the exopods of legs 1-4, eK gracẚle sp. nov. belongs to the so-called subgroup 2 of Ooishi (1998, 2009b). However, detailed comparison with its congeners in the subgroup is unnecessary since it exhibits numerous outstanding features, including: (1) the body is extremely elongate, about 11 times longer than wide; (2) the abdomen is reduced to a small segment; (3) the caudal rami are rudimentary and lack setae; (4) the antennae and legs 1-5 are adpressed to the ventral surface of the body; (5) the mouthparts are represented only by the maxilliped; and (6) leg 5 is absent.

Published as part of Kim, Il-Hoi & Boxshall, Geoff A., 2021, Copepods (Cyclopoida) associated with ascidian hosts: Ascidicolidae, Buproridae, Botryllophilidae, and Enteropsidae, with descriptions of 84 new species, pp. 1-286 in Zootaxa 1 on page 145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4978.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4820443

Keywords

Arthropoda, Ascidicolidae, Animalia, Biodiversity, Cyclopoida, Haplostoma, Maxillopoda, Haplostoma gracile, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green