Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.47986
Today, agile product development techniques are widely used providing a rapidly and steadily progression of incremental product improvements. Traditionally, a product certification is issued in a late stage of the development process, although some Common Criteria evaluation paradigm would exists to support an agile or modular development process. The usage of such a paradigm would result in a beneficial certification process, since the evaluator gains experience through the maturing product. To provide a systematic way to integrate the evaluation process into the development process - and thus saving money and time - we have identified use case scenarios with the according evaluation paradigm, providing a selection scheme for the right paradigm.
Common Criteria, Security Evaluation
Common Criteria, Security Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts