Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044 , 10.5281/zenodo.4757568 , 10.5281/zenodo.4756986 , 10.5281/zenodo.4756987
pmid: 32834371
pmc: PMC7305889
handle: 11343/278588
doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044 , 10.5281/zenodo.4757568 , 10.5281/zenodo.4756986 , 10.5281/zenodo.4756987
pmid: 32834371
pmc: PMC7305889
handle: 11343/278588
COVID-19 accentuates the case for a global, rather than an international, development paradigm. The novel disease is a prime example of a development challenge for all countries, through the failure of public health as a global public good. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the falsity of any assumption that the global North has all the expertise and solutions to tackle global challenges, and has further highlighted the need for multi-directional learning and transformation in all countries towards a more sustainable and equitable world. We illustrate our argument for a global development paradigm by examining the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic across four themes: global value chains, digitalisation, debt, and climate change. We conclude that development studies must adapt to a very different context from when the field emerged in the mid-20th century.
Annika Surmeier receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 799041.
Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Pandemic, Global Value Chains, Climate Change, Geography, Planning and Development, Global Development, COVID-19, Development, 300, Debt, Digitalisation, Global Development Institute, Viewpoint, Policy Forum or Opinion, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/global_development_institute; name=Global Development Institute, Development Studies, International Development
Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Pandemic, Global Value Chains, Climate Change, Geography, Planning and Development, Global Development, COVID-19, Development, 300, Debt, Digitalisation, Global Development Institute, Viewpoint, Policy Forum or Opinion, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/global_development_institute; name=Global Development Institute, Development Studies, International Development
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 212 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts