Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Deception Island Chinstrap pengui GPS and TDR tracking data 2018-2019 processed and raw

Authors: Lowther, A.D; Blanchet, M-A; Ahonen, H.; Oosthuizen, W.C.; Jouanneau, W.; Kruger, L.; Makhado, A.; +1 Authors

Deception Island Chinstrap pengui GPS and TDR tracking data 2018-2019 processed and raw

Abstract

GPS data: 81 individuals with useable GPS tracks (removed 2 that had few points) Penguins have been instrumented between 29th November 2018 – 14th January 2019 Captures were organised per round (8) at Bailey head + MAC point The GPS data have been preprocessed = Penguin_GPS_tidy Removed all Nas Removed locations with less than 4 satellittes Removed all locations that are positive (aka impossible) Match GPS data with penguins metadata Cut off by deployment date + 24h and by revovery date Removed D_R4_P10 that had a very high sampling rate (instrument failure?) Applied a speed filter (SDA filter) Build a CRAWL model for each track (no error model, couldn’t get it to work on GPS data with a constant error of 50m) Predicted regularly time spaced locations every 2 min based on the model (Penguin_GPS_tidyMOD) Penguin_GPS_tidy2 holds the clean dataset with the correct cut off dates at the start (right before the 1st trip and at the recovery date) TDR data: 3(4) instrument types: Axy-trek (“regular” and AGM), Mk9 WC and LOTEK 64 dive files associated with GPS data Each have a different decoding software and result in a different .csv file Each file is loaded and saved into a separate .Rds environment Each file is cleaned for Nas and only the TDR columns are kept The records are ordered by date Dives calibration For LOTEK instruments, I took the mean of the surface points (all the positive values after changing the sign of depth aka a point below the surface has a negative depth value). The mean of the surface points was between 2.3 and 1.7 m . That was the offset for each instrument used in the calibrDepth function. downsampled each record to 1 point every 15 sec. I tested that over a few chunks of records and between 1 sec resolution and 15 sec we are retaining over 92% of the dives and the ones that are lost are mainly very shallow dives (<5m) For MAC point we have 34 913 dives from 5 animals

Related Organizations
Keywords

GPS, TDR, diving, movement, Chinstrap penguins, Antarctica, tracking

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2