Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Yahoo-Yahoo Hash-Tag Tweets Using Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining Algorithms

Authors: Abayomi-Alli Adebayo; Abayomi-Alli Olusola; Misra Sanjay; Fernandez-Sanz Luis;

Yahoo-Yahoo Hash-Tag Tweets Using Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining Algorithms

Abstract

Background Social media opinion has become a medium to quickly access large, valuable, and rich details of information on any subject matter within a short period. Twitter being a social microblog site, generate over 330 million tweets monthly across different countries. Analysing trending topics on Twitter presents opportunities to extract meaningful insight into different opinions on various issues. Aim This study aims to gain insights into the trending yahoo-yahoo topic on Twitter using content analysis of selected historical tweets. Methodology The widgets and workflow engine in the Orange Data mining toolbox were employed for all the text mining tasks. 5500 tweets were collected from Twitter using the “yahoo yahoo” hashtag. The corpus was pre-processed using a pre-trained tweet tokenizer, Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning (VADER) was used for the sentiment and opinion mining, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) was used for topic modelling. In contrast, Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was used to visualize the modelled topics. Results Results showed that "yahoo" appeared in the corpus 9555 times, 175 unique tweets were returned after duplicate removal. Contrary to expectation, Spain had the highest number of participants tweeting on the 'yahoo yahoo' topic within the period. The result of Vader sentiment analysis returned 35.85%, 24.53%, 15.09%, and 24.53%, negative, neutral, no-zone, and positive sentiment tweets, respectively. The word yahoo was highly representative of the LDA topics 1, 3, 4, 6, and LSI topic 1. Conclusion It can be concluded that emojis are even more representative of the sentiments in tweets faster than the textual contents. Also, despite popular belief, a significant number of youths regard cybercrime as a detriment to society.

Keywords

Opinion mining, content analysis, text classification, cyber-crime, cloud computing, Twitter, Topic Modelling

EOSC Subjects

Twitter Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 21
    download downloads 2
  • 21
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
21
2