Views provided by UsageCounts
The aim of this study is to draw up a tool to identify the needs detected by the Mixed Ability Rugby environment for its promotion as a means of inclusion of people with disabilities in sport and in the community. The Delphi method is used for the development and validation of the tool. A coordinating group is formed, made up of 5 people (2 linked to the university and 3 specialists in Mixed Ability Rugby), and a group of experts in which 17 professionals in processes of inclusion, sport and disability from Spain, Chile and Ecuador participated. The coordinating group drafts the questionnaire and identifies the groups within the agents involved in the Mixed Ability Rugby environment to whom the questionnaire is addressed: players with and without disabilities, family members/personal assistants/support persons or legal representatives of players, coaching and support staff of clubs, and referees. Three consultation rounds with experts are carried out to determine the final structure and content of the questionnaire. As a result, the Q-NeMAR questionnaire is obtained, which will show the needs detected by these agents to promote Mixed Ability Rugby. This will enable the development of strategies and policies to improve its visibility in order to create opportunities for inclusion of all people in sport.
CC BY-NC 4.0 This work was supported by the INDITEX-UDC 2021 Grant for predoctoral stays. The authors wish to thank all the experts who collaborated in the validation process.
sport management, sport context, Delphi method, rugby players, disability sport, social inclusion, Q-NeMAR
sport management, sport context, Delphi method, rugby players, disability sport, social inclusion, Q-NeMAR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts