Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Recent years have seen rapid development of neuroscientific research projects using deep neural networks as a modeling framework to explain human cognitive and brain function. A growing concern — both in the research fields of cognitive neuroscience and deep learning— is whether findings can be reproduced using identical or similar models and datasets, as should be expected. However, each domain has its own research objectives and aims to reproduce patterns relating to distinct types of scientific claims. Cognitive computational neuroscience makes claims about human cognitive and neural processing, while deep learning research focuses on the performance of artificial neural networks. The issues around the reproducibility of these claims thus need to be tackled in idiosyncratic ways. In this talk, I will describe these issues in detail, and outline existing tools for ensuring reproducibility at the intersection of deep learning and cognitive neuroscience.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts