Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this presentation, we will share an overview of an international, multi-institutional, 3-year project focused on building Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM), recently funded for £3.5 million by Research England, the Arcadia Fund (UK), and the partners: Birkbeck, University of London, Coventry University, the Digital Preservation Coalition, Jisc, Lancaster University, Loughborough University Library, ScholarLed, and University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) Library. COPIM comprises 6 “work projects” that are rooted in the firm conviction that, in order for open access publishing initiatives to thrive, we have to develop more robust definitions of “open” that go beyond releasing content from behind paywalls. It pilots a range of interventions, from developing open, transparent, sustainable, and community-governed infrastructures for the curation, dissemination, discovery, and long-term preservation of open content and open data, to following the best practices for integrating open content into institutional library, digital learning, and repository systems, as well as devising new revenue models for sustaining OA book publishing at various scales. ScholarLed believes it is vital to ensure that the mechanisms used by OA publishers are driven by, and responsive to, the varied needs of an international scholarly community, and a key aspect of COPIM is that it privileges close working relationships between publishers, librarians, and other knowledge managers.
Community-led Open Publishing Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) is supported by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, and Arcadia—a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.
Digital Publishing, ScholarLed, Open Infrastructure, Open Access, OA books, Library Publishing, Open Data, Humanities & Social Sciences, Scholarly Communications, Monographs, Scholar-led Publishing, Humanities & Social Sciences, Open Source Software
Digital Publishing, ScholarLed, Open Infrastructure, Open Access, OA books, Library Publishing, Open Data, Humanities & Social Sciences, Scholarly Communications, Monographs, Scholar-led Publishing, Humanities & Social Sciences, Open Source Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 21 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts