Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Image . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Electronic Lab Notebook Comparison Matrix

Authors: Harvard Longwood Medical Area Research Data Management Working Group;

Electronic Lab Notebook Comparison Matrix

Abstract

The Electronic Lab Notebook (ELN) Comparison Matrix was created by the Longwood Medical Area Research Data Management Working Group (LMA RDMWG) in 2018 to aid Harvard researchers in the Longwood Medical Area in the process of identifying practical ELN tools to meet their specific research needs. To create a useful resource, a survey was sent to 26 ELN vendors and a matrix was created based on the responses. Since then, additional platforms were added, totaling 33 options. The tools listed in the ELN Matrix were selected strictly on their relevance to the LMA biomedical research community concerning their intended function to replace and enhance conventional (hard copy) laboratory notebooks. Inclusion of a tool in the ELN Matrix does not imply an endorsement by Harvard, and exclusion of a tool is based solely on relevance; no evaluations of tool quality were made or acted upon in developing the ELN Matrix. While targeted for Harvard researchers, this Electronic Lab Notebook Comparison Matrix has been recognized around the world on Twitter, Wikipedia, and recently in Nature, making it a go-to educational tool and decision map for librarians and researchers alike. In 2021, the LMA RDMWG made the decision to archive this project. This resource is no longer maintained by the LMA RDMWG and snapshots of the matrix were last captured on April 19, 2021, and the website pages were captured on May 5, 2021. Viewers can still explore the archived information, but it is suggested you visit the ELN product websites for the most up-to-date specifications.

Additional website content archived through Archive-It.

Keywords

electronic lab notebooks, matrix

EOSC Subjects

Twitter Data

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3K
    download downloads 3K
  • 3K
    views
    3K
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3K
3K