Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The data involved in this project are used to answer the following research questions: what are the classes of errors that characterize invalid DOIs? Which classes of errors can be addressed through automatic processes so as to get the correct DOIs? How many correct DOIs and, consequently, citations have been obtained by applying such automatic processing? While searching for answers to these questions, we used DOI names that have been collected by the OpenCitations Index Of Crossref Open DOI-To-DOI References (COCI) while processing data provided by Crossref.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts