Views provided by UsageCounts
Efficient and dependable communication is a highly relevant aspect for IoT systems in which tiny sensors, actuators, wearables, or other smart devices exchange messages with each other or with cloud services. Various application layer protocols of the ISO OSI model are especially suitable in the IoT context to cope with the communication behavior of IoT systems. Many of them follow the publish/subscribe communication pattern. The selection process of a suitable protocol should take the communication behavior of the application, the resource requirements on the end device, and the network environment into account. The decision requires knowledge about the performance and the robustness of the protocols in various settings, especially in wireless networks as often used in IoT environments. Benchmarking is a common approach to evaluate and compare systems, considering the performance and aspects like dependability or security. In this paper, we present our IoT communication benchmarking framework ComBench for publish/subscribe protocols in the IoT context focusing on constrained networks. The benchmarking framework supports system designers, software engineers, and application developers to select and investigate communication protocols' behavior. In particular, our benchmarking framework contributes to (i) show the impact of fluctuating network quality on communication, (ii) compare multiple protocols, protocol features, and protocol implementations, and (iii) analyze scalability, robustness, and dependability of clients, networks, and brokers in different scenarios. Our case study demonstrates our benchmarking framework's applicability to support the decision for the best-suited protocol in various scenarios.
Benchmarking, Publish/Subscribe, IoT, Network Protocols, Mobile Networks
Benchmarking, Publish/Subscribe, IoT, Network Protocols, Mobile Networks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts