Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2019
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Abscondita perplexa

Authors: Ho, - Z.;

Abscondita perplexa

Abstract

Abscondita perplexa (Walker 1858) Colophotia perplexa Walker 1858: 282. Type. Colophotia perplexa Walker. CEYLON (SRI LANKA): male (NHML). Luciola perplexa (Walker). Olivier 1902: 84. Gorham 1903: 327. Luciola dejeani Gemminger 1870: 1651. Masters 1886: 289. Olivier 1902: 77; 1907: 51; 1910a: 42. Type. Luciola dejeani Gemminger. Not located by Ballantyne & Lambkin 2000: 59. Luciola dejeani Gemminger. Olliff 1890: 652. Lea 1909: 108; 1921a: 197; 1921b: 66. Luciola (Luciola) dejeani Gemminger. McDermott 1966: 103. Calder 1998: 179. Ballantyne & Lambkin 2000: 59 (synonymy). Luciola dubia Olivier 1903a: 11. Gardner 1947: 125. Ballantyne & Lambkin 2000: 59. Type. Luciola dubia Olivier. Syntype series (11 males, 8 females) INDIA (IRNSB). Abscondita perplexa (Walker 1858). Ballantyne et al. 2013: 1, Fig. 18. Diagnosis. One of four Abscondita species with pale dorsum and black elytral apices, distinguished from both Abs. chinensis and Abs. terminalis, which both have very dark terminal abdominal tergites, by the pale terminal abdominal tergites in the male; from Abs. anceyi which has no dark abdominal markings, by the dark markings on V5 and the much larger size of Abs. anceyi. New Thailand records have no dark abdominal ventrites anterior to the LO and are distinguished from Abs. anceyi by the larger size of the former and the outline of the tip of the aedeagal sheath sternite (Nak-eiam 2015). Other specimens examined. THAILAND: Northern Thailand Doi Inthanon NP 7−14.iv.1988 MG Allen, 3 males, 6 females (NHML). INDIA. Assam state N 25.35 E 93.26 Kohora (=Kaziranga) village at Green Road Hotel, 160 m at light, 16−18.iv.2008, Fikácek, Podskalská, Śipek, 6 males 2 females (PRAGUE). Guwahati, Gauhati Uni- versity campus near a lotus pond May 2016, 7 males taken in flight with 3 males of Sclerotia substriata (ANIC). Remarks. Barua et al. (2007) recorded in vivo light production of this species (as Luciola praeusta) and recorded a full width at maximum value significantly narrower than the in vivo half width previously reported. They suggested this could mean that the speed of the chemiluminescence reaction in this firefly is much faster than previously thought. Ballantyne et al. (2013) reassessed the identification of the species based on the Indian specimens from Guwahati listed above. Wijekoon et al. (2016) identified specimens in the National Sri Lankan collection in Colombo as Abs. perplexa.

Published as part of Ho, - Z., 2019, The Luciolinae of S. E. Asia and the Australopacific region: a revisionary checklist (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) including description of three new genera and 13 new species, pp. 1-174 in Zootaxa 4687 (1) on pages 41-42, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4687.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3508098

Keywords

Coleoptera, Abscondita, Insecta, Arthropoda, Abscondita perplexa, Animalia, Biodiversity, Lampyridae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2