Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.46848
These are the datasets used in the following study: Fachada, N., Lopes, V.V., Martins, R.C. and Rosa, A.C., Model-independent comparison of simulation output. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 72:131–149, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.12.013 (arXiv version available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.09174)
{"references": ["Fachada, N., Lopes, V.V., Martins, R.C. and Rosa, A.C.,\u00a0Model-independent comparison\u00a0of\u00a0simulation output. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory,\u00a072:131\u2013149, 2017,\u00a0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.12.013"]}
simulation output analysis, PCA, model replication, docking, model alignment, modeling, agent-based modeling, simulation
simulation output analysis, PCA, model replication, docking, model alignment, modeling, agent-based modeling, simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts