Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This was an interactive workshop for policy makers, practitioners and others working with GDPR, research ethics, and Codes of Conduct. Participants have gained practical insights into the challenges inherent in establishing a Code of Conduct and learn the how and why from experts in the field. The outcomes of the workshop will be incorporated into an ongoing project task to set up a Code of Conduct specifically for Social Sciences and Humanities researchers. The content of the workshop was as follows: Presentation of findings from SSHOC report on the impact of the GDPR and its implications for EOSC, Ina Nepstad NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data Anatomy of a Code of Conduct and Implications for GDPR, Mathilde Steinsvåg Hansen, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data Creation of a Code of Conduct in health research, Michaela Th. Mayrhofer, BBMRI ERIC Plenary and break-out discussion of experiences, challenges, and recommendations
data privacy, data protection, code of conduct, personal data, GDPR, ethics
data privacy, data protection, code of conduct, personal data, GDPR, ethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts