Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Understanding the user's intention is crucial for many tasks that involve human-machine interaction. To that end, word sense disambiguation (WSD) techniques play an important role. WSD techniques typically require well-formed sentences as context to operate, as well as pre-defined catalogues of word senses. However, there are some scenarios on the Web where such conditions do not apply well, such as when there is a need to disambiguate keywords from a query, or sets of tags describing any Web resource, where the context does not come as well-formed sentences. In this paper, we propose an approach to disambiguate sets of keywords by linking them to concepts of a given ontology that is not known at training time. Our approach grounds on a semantic relatedness measure between words and concepts, and explores different disambiguation algorithms to study the contribution of both word and sentence-level representations. We focus on situations where the available linguistic information is very scarce (e.g., keyword-based / Web search queries), hampering natural language based approaches. Experimental results show the feasibility of our approach in general and in specific knowledge domains without previous training for the target domain.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 17 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts