Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Chlamydera maculata subsp. carteri Mathews

Authors: Lecroy, Mary;

Chlamydera maculata subsp. carteri Mathews

Abstract

[Chlamydera maculata nova Mathews] [Chlamydera maculata carteri Mathews] Chlamydera maculata nova Mathews, 1920: 76 (North-west Cape, Mid-west Australia). Chlamydera maculata carteri Mathews in Carter and Mathews, 1920: 499. Now Chlamydera guttata carteri Mathews, 1920. Mathews (1920: 76) introduced C. m. nova and designated as the type a specimen collected on ‘‘ North-west Cape, Mid-west Australia’’ on 7 August 1916. AMNH 679152, female, collected at Hooroomooroo, North West Cape, by Tom Carter, bears an AMNH type label, but the date on this specimen is 6 August 1916, and it is therefore not the type even though it was collected by Carter on the same collecting trip. Hartert (1929a: 55–57) did not list a type in the Rothschild Collection for nova and no specimen was so cataloged when the Rothschild Collection came to New York. An illustrated account of nova was published by Carter and Mathews (1920: 499) and in an initialed footnote, Mathews offered carteri as a replacement name for C. maculata nova if it and Alphachlamydera cerviniventris nova Mathews, 1915, were both included in Chlamydera. C. maculata nova and C. maculata carteri share the same type. Frith and Frith (1997) traced the six specimens that Carter (in Carter and Mathews, 1921: 75–79) secured and found that there were two collected on 7 August, but one was marked ‘‘ nova type.’’ They designated this specimen, HLW 6591 in MV, as the lectotype of Chlamydera maculata nova (not of Chlamydera guttata carteri, although the two names automatically share the same type). AMNH 679152 remains in the AMNH type collection because it bears a type label, but an added label explains its nontype status. Only 7 August 1916 was mentioned in the original description; the second specimen in MV collected on that date would be the paralectotype.

Published as part of Lecroy, Mary, 2014, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History Part 12. Passeriformes: Ploceidae, Sturnidae, Buphagidae, Oriolidae, Dicruridae, Callaeidae, Grallinidae, Corcoracidae, Artamidae, Cracticidae, Ptilonorhynchidae, Cnemophilidae, Paradisaeidae, And Corvidae, pp. 1-165 in Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2014 (393) on page 89, DOI: 10.1206/885.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4629954

Keywords

Chlamydera maculata, Animalia, Biodiversity, Passeriformes, Chlamydera, Chordata, Aves, Ptilonorhynchidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2