Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11390/1147043
Besides vision and audition, everyday materials can be passively explored also using touch if they provide tactile feedback to users, for instance in consequence of an external force exciting their natural resonances. If such resonances are known to provide informative auditory cues of material, on the other hand their role when a recognition is made through touch is debatable. Even more questionable is a material recognition from their reproductions: if happening, then they could be used to enrich existing touch-screen interactions with ecological auditory and haptic feedback furthermore requiring inexpensive actuation. With this goal in mind, two experiments are proposed evaluating user's ability to classify wooden, plastic, and metallic surfaces respectively using auditory and haptic cues. Although the literature reports successful auditory classification of everyday material simulations, especially the passive recognition of such material reproductions by holding a finger on a vibrating glass surface has never been tested. By separately reproducing the sound and vibration of a ping-pong ball bouncing on wood, plastic and metal surfaces, our tests report not only auditory, but also tactile recognition of the same materials significantly above chance. Discrepancies existing between our and previously reported results are discussed.
+ ID: 572115 + PeerReviewed: Peer Reviewed
Cognitive science, perception, material recognition, audio, haptic, [SCCO.COMP] Cognitive science/Computer science, Material Discrimination, [SCCO.PSYC] Cognitive science/Psychology, Audio Haptic Feedback, Material
Cognitive science, perception, material recognition, audio, haptic, [SCCO.COMP] Cognitive science/Computer science, Material Discrimination, [SCCO.PSYC] Cognitive science/Psychology, Audio Haptic Feedback, Material
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 30 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts