Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This collaborative research was conducted on robotic-assisted surgery within a Swiss academic hospital. We used a methodology of cross self-confrontation to investigate learning and training in the operating room with three different populations: surgeons, surgical nurses and operating room assistants. In particular, we researched whether videorecordings from real operations can be transformed into learning and teaching tools. We highlight three aspects of our findings: (a) all professions report mixed feelings regarding a demanding situation; (b) an academic hospital is a setting in which a complex and flexible interplay of technical and didactic functions is observed; (c) the solving of potential technical problems tends to be delegated by surgeons to hierarchically lower-level professionals, i.e. surgical nurses and operating room assistants. As a conclusion, the research exemplifies the needs for additional teaching and learning spaces outside the operating room, as well as the challenges of learning scientificated knowledge—in-action in this medical setting.
learning robotic-assisted surgery, interprofessional collaboration, training in robotic-assisted surgery, cross self-confrontations
learning robotic-assisted surgery, interprofessional collaboration, training in robotic-assisted surgery, cross self-confrontations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 25 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts