Views provided by UsageCounts
This dataset employs a simplified version of fault orientation relative to the stress tensors and ranks the propensity of movement as a three-level risk (high, medium, low). Fault segments in the fault systems located within the Illinois basin and surrounding portion of the eastern Midcontinent are assigned a risk based on their relative orientation to the principal horizontal stress. Horizontal stress tensors are arrayed relative to the fault segments in two different manners: a generalized single value for the average stress orientation (N 60° E for the entire domain), and a locally specific orientation of the stress tensors based on an inversion of earthquake fault plane solutions and stress indicators. The assessment of fault-slip-risk potential based on fault orientation relative to the orientation of the principal horizontal stress is improved by incorporating local stress tensor orientations over a single regional value. This layer is a product of the analysis described in: Rupp, J.A., Letsinger, S.L., and Carlson, G., 2018, Fault angle control on potential seismic slip in the Illinois Basin region: Seismological Research Letters, v 89, no 6, p. 2461-2472. doi: 10.1785/0220180153. Spatial Reference: WGS 1984 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere)
{"references": ["Rupp, J.A., Letsinger, S.L., and Carlson, G., 2018, Fault angle control on potential seismic slip in the Illinois Basin region: Seismological Research Letters, v 89, no 6, p. 2461-2472. doi: 10.1785/0220180153."]}
fault, fault failure, fault risk, hazard, geology, seismic, Midwest USA, Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, earthquake
fault, fault failure, fault risk, hazard, geology, seismic, Midwest USA, Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, earthquake
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 43 |

Views provided by UsageCounts