Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 35031789
handle: 10044/1/91747
Abstract As research becomes predominantly digitalised, scientists have the option of using electronic laboratory notebooks to record and access entries, meeting volume, complexity, accessibility and preservation requirements where paper notebooks fall short. The technology can yield many benefits; however, these can only be realised by choosing a system that properly fulfils the requirements of a given context. This perspective explores the considerations for an academic focused electronic laboratory notebook by citing pertinent studies, as well as drawing from our own experience implementing a system within a multi-disciplinary research environment. We consider how the required financial and time investment is shared between individuals and institutions. Finally, we discuss how electronic laboratory notebooks fit into the broader context of research data management. This perspective is not a product review; it provides a framework for both the initial consideration of an electronic laboratory notebook and the evaluation of specific software packages.
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Science & Technology, 330, Bioinformatics, 06 Biological Sciences, 03 Chemical Sciences, Laboratories, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Biochemical Research Methods, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Software
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Science & Technology, 330, Bioinformatics, 06 Biological Sciences, 03 Chemical Sciences, Laboratories, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Biochemical Research Methods, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 14 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts