Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Euryoryzomys lamia

Authors: Moreira, Camila Do Nascimento; Ventura, Karen; Percequillo, Alexandre Reis; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Yatiyo;

Euryoryzomys lamia

Abstract

Euryoryzomys lamia Karyotype: 2n = 58 and FN = 84. Autosomal complement: 14 biarmed pairs large to small decreasing in size, and 14 acrocentric pairs medium to small decreasing in size. Sex chromosomes: X, a medium subtelocentric; Y, a submetacentric. G-banding was also performed (Bonvicino et al. 1998, pp. 254, Fig. 1; Bonvicino et al. 2005). The same karyotype and two different cytotypes for this species were reported by Andrades-Miranda et al. (2000) for specimens from Goiás, Brazil. Cytotype 1: 2n = 64 and FN = 84. Autosomal complement: 11 biarmed pairs large to small decreasing in size, and 20 acrocentric pairs medium to small decreasing in size. Sex chromosomes: X, a large subtelocentric; Y, unknown as only as two females were analyzed. Cytotype 2: 2n = 60 and FN = 84. Autosomal complement: 13 biarmed pairs large to small decreasing in size, and 16 acrocentric pairs (one large and the remaining small). Sex chromosomes: X, a large subtelocentric; Y, unknown as only a female was analyzed. C-banding metaphases exhibited pericentromeric constitutive heterochromatic blocks on all autosomes and on the X chromosomes (Andrade-Miranda et al. 2000, pp. 466, 3B and C). According to the authors, the two different cytotypes reported differs in that presented by Bonvicino et al. (1998), because they present karyotypes with six additional (cytotype 1) and two extra (cytotype 2) pairs of small acrocentric and less three pairs and one pair of biarmed chromosomes, respectively. This decrease of the number of acrocentric pairs suggests that Robertsonian rearrangement could differentiate the three cytotypes of E. lamia (Andrades-Miranda et al. 2000). The first karyotype described for this species (2n = 58 and FN = 84) was reported only for specimens collected in the northern region of Goiás, states of Brazil (Table 3, Fig. 3), whereas the cytotype 1 (2n = 64 and FN = 84) and cytotype 2 (2n = 60 and FN = 84) occur sympatrically in the southern region of this same state (Table 3, Fig. 3).

Published as part of Moreira, Camila Do Nascimento, Ventura, Karen, Percequillo, Alexandre Reis & Yonenaga-Yassuda, Yatiyo, 2020, A review on the cytogenetics of the tribe Oryzomyini (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae), with the description of new karyotypes, pp. 1-111 in Zootaxa 4876 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4876.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4423612

Keywords

Mammalia, Animalia, Rodentia, Euryoryzomys, Biodiversity, Chordata, Euryoryzomys lamia, Taxonomy, Cricetidae

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2