Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Audiovisual . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Audiovisual . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Audiovisual . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

New insights on the relation between stellar metallicity and the architectures of planetary systems

Authors: Ghezzi, Luan; Wilson, Robert; Martinez, Cintia; Cunha, Katia; Smith, Verne; Majewski, Steven;

New insights on the relation between stellar metallicity and the architectures of planetary systems

Abstract

Correlations between stellar and planetary properties provide important information about the processes of planet formation and evolution and the resulting architectures of planetary systems. Recent studies have provided evidence that higher stellar metallicities are connected to the presence of planets of certain sizes and orbital periods. In this work, we explored these relations further by focusing on planetary systems instead of individual planets. We derived independent and homogeneous iron abundances for a sample of 1005 planet hosting stars from the California-Kepler Survey (CKS) using a classical LTE spectroscopic analysis. Although we confirmed the well-known result that the metallicities of stars hosting large planets are significantly skewed to higher metallicities relative to systems with only small planets, we also found that the boundary between the large- and small-planet regimes occurs at Rp = 4.4 R_Earth. We observed that the previously reported differences between the host-star metallicity distributions for hot and warm planets also hold for planetary systems, with the former being more metal-rich. However, we show that planet multiplicity also plays an important role and these differences seem to be larger for multiple relative to single planet systems. The most significant difference is seen for systems hosting only Super-Earths and a similar result is not found for systems hosting only Sub-Neptunes, revealing an important distinction within the regime of small planets.

{"references": ["Ghezzi, Montet & Johnson (2018). arXiv:1804.09082", "Martinez et al. (2019). arXiv:1903.00174", "Petigura et al. (2017). arXiv:1703.10400", "Petigura et al. (2018). arXiv:1712.04042", "Weiss et al. (2018). arXiv:1808.03010"]}

Related Organizations
Keywords

Chemical abundances, Stellar systems, clusters, and associations, Fundamental parameters of stars, Planetary system formation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 12
  • 7
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
12
Related to Research communities