Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cav3.2-/- Mouse #260 CA1 EEG recording

Authors: Weiergräber, Marco;

Cav3.2-/- Mouse #260 CA1 EEG recording

Abstract

A Cav3.2-/- mouse (internal #260) was implanted with an intrahippocampal electrode for electrohippocampal CA1 EEG recordings. The differential electrode of the TA10ETA-F20 transmitter (Data Science International, DSI, USA, technical specifications: weight 3.9 g, volume 1.9 cc, input voltage range ± 2.5 mV, channel bandwidth (B) 1–200 Hz, nominal sampling rate (f) 1000 Hz (f = 5 B), temperature operating range 34–41 °C) was positioned at the following stereotaxic coordinates: (+)-lead, caudal − 2 mm, lateral of bregma 1.5 mm (right hemisphere), and dorsoventral (depth) 1.5 mm. The epidural reference electrode was positioned on the surface of the cerebellar cortex at the following stereotaxic coordinates: (−)-lead, bregma − 6 mm and lateral of bregma 1 mm (right hemisphere). The deep tungsten electrodes (FHC, USA) are encapsuled with epoxylite with an impedance of 50–100 kΩ (measured at 1000 Hz) and a shank diameter of 250 μm. For further details on the Cav3.2 mouse model, animal experimentation approval, anaesthesia, transmitter insertion, stereotaxic electrode implantation, postoperative pain management and recovery, please refer to Arshaad MI et al., 2021. EEG data were exported to NeuroScore 3.2.9306-1 (Data Sciences International, DSI, USA). As the NeuroScore file format does not allow free access to the data, we have exported the raw EEG data as asci.-files, so that they can easily be imported in secondary analysis software. Importantly, the exported EEG data represent raw EEG data. No filtering, no artefact detection and/or artefact removal have been carried out. Thus, it is the users responsibility to adequately pretreat the data before further processing and analysis. As described in Arshaad MI et al. (2021), filtering, artefact detection and removal was carried out using NeuroScore before further analysis. The EEG data are presented here as a zip-folder for size reasons. Four EEG recordings are exported: R1 (a first 24h long-term EEG recording 10 days post transmitter implantation), R2 (a second 24h long-term recording 17 days post transmitter implantation), U1 (a 6h EEG recording following the first urethane injection (800 mg/kg i.p.) at day 18 post transmitter implantation), U2 (a 6h EEG recording after a second urethane injection (800 mg/kg i.p.) at day 25 post transmitter implantation). In addition, relative activity values are exported for all four recordings. For details on the recording procedure, please refer to Arshaad MI et al. (2021).

{"references": ["Enhanced hippocampal type II theta activity aND altered theta architecture in mice lacking the Cav3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channel. Arshaad MI, Siwek ME, Henseler C, Daubner J, Ehninger D, Hescheler J, Sachinidis A, Broich K, Papazoglou A, Weiergr\u00e4ber M. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79763-4."]}

Keywords

activity, CA1, EEG, hippocampus, low voltage-activated, T-type, voltage-gated calcium channel

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2