Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Knowledge and Technology Exchange (KTE) Survey at Eawag

Authors: Gaertner, Maike;

Knowledge and Technology Exchange (KTE) Survey at Eawag

Abstract

Knowledge and Technology Exchange (KTE) is, in addition to research and teaching, one of the three key tasks of Eawag’s researchers. This study was carried out in order to learn how the scientists could be supported more effectively in their KTE activities. Its focus is on the scientist rather than external stakeholders. For this reason, a survey was conducted among 232 researchers at Eawag. The quantitative questionnaire encompassed items with different levels of measurement and additional options for qualitative comments. Its analysis include descriptive and inferential statistics. The replies of the participating scientists revealed not only that many different KTE activities are important for their research but also that they have possibilities to be engaged in these activities. Furthermore, many researchers stated that intrinsic motivators, like an interest to promote the diffusion of research findings (Q_34, T2B 93%), are the reason for their current engagement in KTE activities. In contrast, measures that are expected to increase the effectivity of future KTE activities can be categorised as rather extrinsic motivators. The highest agreement was found for dedicated funding (Q_30, T2B 75%), an alteration of the metrics of science (Q_25, T2B 68%), and an embedment of external stakeholders in research projects for the entire duration of the project (Q_24, T2B 63%). Thus, it can be recommended to support a wide range of KTE activities, foster the intrinsic motivation of researchers, and set external incentives for KTE activities. However, due to the small completion rate of the questionnaire (13%), the recommendations need to be verified and backed up in further investigations before they should be put into action on a larger scale.

Keywords

importance, needs, motivation, questionnaire, knowlege and technology transfer, water research, Switzerland

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 5
  • 7
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
5
Green