Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mock communities for evaluating the performance of metagenomic classifiers

Authors: Parks, Donovan; Rigato, Fabio; Vera-Wolf, Patricia; Krause, Lutz; Hugenholtz, Philip; Tyson, Gene; Wood, David;

Mock communities for evaluating the performance of metagenomic classifiers

Abstract

Set of 140 in silico microbial communities used to evaluate the performance of metagenomic classifiers. These mock communities have varying species diversity, intraspecific diversity, and genomic similarity to a standardized reference genome database. Each mock was simulated to a depth of 2.1 Gb using 2×150 bp paired-end reads with strain abundances following a log-normal distribution. Each mock community has the format ani<ani>_c<complexity>_st<strain_diversity>_r<replicate> where: ani: indicates the ANI between genomes in the mock and standardized reference database. This field is 95, 97, or 99 indicating ANI ranges of [95%, 97%), [97, 99%), and [99, 99.75%), respectively. Mock communities at 100% ANI are also provide as a baseline and were constructed from genomes within the standardized reference database. complexity: indicates the species diversity of the mock. This field is either LOW or HIGH indicating the mock is comprised of 100 +/- 25 or 500 +/- 100 species, respectively. strain_diversity: indicates the strain diversity within each species. This field is False or True indicating the mock is either comprised of a single strain (genome) from each species or up to 10 randomly selected strains (genomes) from each species. replicate: indicates the replicate number of the mock. Ten replicates were generated for each parameter combination. Mock communities were simulated under all combinations of these parameters, with the exception of mocks with HIGH species diversity and [95%, 97) ANI similarity as there were insufficient species with available genomes within this ANI range. Note: provided files contain both the low and high diversity mocks for the indicated parameters in the filename.

Keywords

metagenomics, taxonomic classification, metagenomic profiling, microbial community, nechmarking, shotgun sequencing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 39
    download downloads 213
  • 39
    views
    213
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
39
213