Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ptomaphagus ruficollis

Authors: Peck, Stewart B.; Gnaspini, Pedro; Newton, Alfred F.;

Ptomaphagus ruficollis

Abstract

A. ruficollis (Portevin, 1903a: 166) (Catops); Jeannel, 1922: 42 (footnote 2) comb. (to Ptomaphagus —see Note under genus Adelopsis, above), 1936: 66 comb. (to Adelopsis, not stated as taxonomic change — see Note under genus Adelopsis, above); Gnaspini, 1996: 539 (types seen); Gnaspini & Peck, 2001: 429 (assignment to group ascutellaris); Salgado, 2010c: 215 (assignment to group elephas); Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 23 (types seen; lectotype designation; assignment back to group; and to subgroup). Lectotype male in MNHN [Syntypes (several specimens, sex not given, [probably] in Grouvelle collection, in original description; 2 males examined in Gnaspini, 1996: 541); as ‘MHNH’ [sic] when referring to the paralectotype in captions of figs. 89-98 in Gnaspini & Peck, 2019]. Type locality: Cochabamba, [2500 m, in the Andes, in Jeannel, 1936; but not in type label (Gnaspini & Peck, 2019)], [Cochabamba Department], Bolivia. Distribution: Bolivia: Cochabamba Department: known only from type locality. = A. heterocera Portevin, 1907: 72; Jeannel, 1922: 42 (and footnote 2) comb. (to Ptomaphagus —see Note under genus Adelopsis, above), 1936: 67 (as heterocerus, back to Adelopsis, not stated as taxonomic change — see Note under genus Adelopsis, above); Gnaspini, 1996: 539 (types seen); Salgado, 2010c: 213 (assignment to group); Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 23 syn. (types seen [Note: Aedeagus missing—we recently learned that there is a glass slide with the male genitalia of this type specimen studied by R. Jeannel and kept separate at the MNHN collection (Michel Perreau, 2019, personal comm.); see Note under MNHN, in ‘Construction and Organization of the Catalog’ and also in Gnaspini & Peck, 2019]). Syntypes (3 males) in MNHN (depository not given in original description; Jeannel, 1936 refers to several specimens in Pic collection; Gnaspini, 1996: 541 examined 2 male types). Type locality: Cochabamba [Department], Bolivia.

Published as part of Peck, Stewart B., Gnaspini, Pedro & Newton, Alfred F., 2020, Updated catalog and generic keys of the Leiodidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of the Neotropical region (" Latin America ": Mexico, the West Indies, and Central and South America), pp. 1-114 in Zootaxa 4741 (1) on page 46, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4741.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3772899

Keywords

Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Ptomaphagus, Animalia, Biodiversity, Leiodidae, Taxonomy, Ptomaphagus ruficollis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2