Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We make this report and study to check the information which we have to give to those learners or medicinal staff to take carefulness of their lives and be carefulness during work, this review held in a hospital located in Sir Ganga Ram hospital Lahore, Pakistan. These types of complications occur during some issues as spine twig damages. We conduct and prepare this report by examining fitness staffs and medicinal learners. We conduct this review in form of question and answers. This report held in month of January-March 2016. So we have seen that from 255 about 102 were those who experience positive results about spine twig damages. We take 255 respondents for test and review. In which ratio of medicinal learners was 145 and 110 was fitness carefulness staffs. Mostly we have seen that these spine twig damages occurred due to taking plasma samples for testing or giving inoculations to victims as recommended by the doctors. So proper information, and follows are needed to avoid all these types of damages. Fitness staffs were those who experience more spine twig damages as compared to the medicinal learners. When we ask them why these types of damages occur, their answers were their careless behavior and deals a lot of people at a time, these types of mistakes occur. Because fitness carefulness staffs do their duties for whole day as taking plasma samples or give inoculations to victims. So we conclude it out as if occurs due to overburdening of work or dealing a lot of victims at a time. About 80% people from those who experience spine twig damages were aware about complications occur with this but 21% of them were not aware as much. Key Words: Medicinal, learners, stress Fitness staffs, spine twig damages.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 6 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts