Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The natural language instructions scripted on the review comments are enormous sources of information about code bug’s nature and expected solutions. In this study, we investigate the performance improvement of repair techniques using code review comments. We train a sequence-to-sequence model on 55,060 code reviews and associated code changes. We also introduce new tokenization and preprocessing approaches that help to achieve significant improvement over state-of-the-art learning-based repair techniques. We boost the top-1 accuracy by 20.33% and top-10 accuracy by 34.82%. We could provide a suggestion for stylistics and non-code errors unaddressed by prior techniques.
repair techniques, -10 accuracy, Physiology, Science Policy, Information Systems not elsewhere classified, preprocessing approaches, Automatic Program, performance improvement, language instructions scripted, Sociology, learning-based repair techniques, code changes, review comments, code review comments, review 4Repair Code Review, sequence-to-sequence model, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
repair techniques, -10 accuracy, Physiology, Science Policy, Information Systems not elsewhere classified, preprocessing approaches, Automatic Program, performance improvement, language instructions scripted, Sociology, learning-based repair techniques, code changes, review comments, code review comments, review 4Repair Code Review, sequence-to-sequence model, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts