{"references": ["Alam, H. (2015), A jihadist from the neighborhood, Belgrade: IKP Armstrong, K. (2016), Fields of blood \u2013 religion and history of violence, Naval War College Review, Volume 69, Number 2 Beck, U. and Levy, D. (2012), Cosmopolitanized Nations: Reimagining Collectivity in World Risk Society, HAL, halshs-00795250 Eagleton, T. (2017), Culture, Zagreb: Ljevak. Fati\u0107, A. (2005). The Role and Structure of Organised Crime in the Balkans, Biblid 0025-8555,55 (2005) Vol. LVII, br. 1-2 Fuller, G. (2015), A world without Islam, Little, Brown and Company Had\u017ei\u0107, F. (2020), The European Union (EU) Political Identity within the migrant crisis, and the Balkan \u2013 Bosnian route; xenophobia and religious identity. Research, Society and Development, 9(10). DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8685 Had\u017ei\u0107, F. (2020), The political psychology of extremism; \"naturalness\" of the pheno-menon in the Western Balkans. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 11(1), 250-267. DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1519 Had\u017ei\u0107, F. (2020), The Politicization of Religion and the Sacralized Balkan Nations Regarding Bosnia and Herzegovina, Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40, Iss. 7, Article 8. Available from: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss7/8 Kovac, M. (2020), \"Macronova politika prema islamu postala dio predizborne kampanje u BiH\". Available from: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/macronova-politika-prema-islamu-postala-dio-predizborne-kampanje-u-bih/30927979.html Marsden, S. and Schmid, A. (2011). Typologies of Terrorism and Political Violence, The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research Moses, D. (2012). Geopolitics of emotion, Belgrade: Clio Neimarlija, H. (2019), \"Razgovor sa Hilmom Neimarlijom: Ko najvi\u0161e dobija od ozna\u010davanja islama kao neprijatelja\", Preporod, Available from: https://www.preporod.info/bs/article/13419/razgovor-sa-hilmom-neimarlijom-ko-najvise-dobija-od-oznacavanja-islama-kao-neprijatelja Rankovi\u0107, M. (2004). Contemporary / Global Terrorism: A Sociological Approach, Sociology, Vol. XLVI N0. 4, p. 313\u2013326. Selimi, K. and Stojkovski, F., (2017), Assessment of Macedonia's efforts in countering violent extremism, view from civil society, Analyticamk Shultz, R. (1978), Conteptualizing political Terrorism: A Typology, International Terrorism, 32 (1) Weber, M. (1924). Wirtschaftsgeschichte: Abriss der universalen Sozial und Wirtschaftsgeschichte,2nd edn, Duncker & Humblot, M\u00fcnchen, Leipzig. Zizek, S. (2015). Interview, Jutarnji list \u0110ori\u0107 M. (2012). \"Theoretical determination of extremism\", Kultura polisa, No. 17"]}

The studyʼs objective is to explore the social and political framework of terrorism and critically analyze the antihumanist approach to denominational hypocrisy of Western and non-Western terrorism. Radicalization and violent extremism are becoming increasingly pronounced threats to societies' security and stability at the global level. Despite the lack of uniform definitions and views on this phenomenon, terrorism as an antihumanist approach to struggle must be condemned by all nations and all religious groups within countries to delegitimize its protagonists. These are issues at the global level and transmitted to the national and local levels. It is a strategy of violence designed to achieve results by gradually causing fear and insecurity. It is the violence directed against faith, tolerance, freedom, and humanistic values internationally. Thus, the suspension of morality and the suspension of legal regulations for everyday conditions, for living in peace. Many violent cases classified as terrorism show that politically motivated violence is a massive, complex, and present issue in societies than reducing the whole phenomenon to militant Islamist groups or isolated individuals. An argument often made in discussions of terrorism is those committed by whites, or Christians, within the political or religious beliefs and ideologies do not count as terrorism because of double standards. The public administrations and the media should avoid calling terrorist organizations Islamic and not forcing “the conflict with Islam”. The hypocritical attitudes and behavioral patterns are contra-productive. The changing “Islamic terrorism” prejudice paradigmʼs discourse should harmonize attitudes and behavioral patterns, which are critical. Extremism can be attributed to any religion, but no religion should, in any case, be accused of motivating extremism.