Following the experimental protocol used in (Geng et al., 2018), we performed the stepping creep experiments at a confining pressure of 10 MPa. We first loaded the samples under hydrostatic conditions up to 10 MPa at a pressure rate of 0.3 MPa/min. Hydrostatic conditions were maintained for ~18 h at 26 °C. Next, differential stress (axial stress minus confining pressure) was increased to a fixed initial stress (30 MPa) and maintained (creep status) for 24 h. The differential stress was repeatedly increased by 5 MPa and maintained for 24 h, until brittle failure. All the experiments were conducted using the triaxial apparatus installed at the Laboratoire de Géologie of ENS-Paris (France). There were few constraints on the natural saturation state of the samples because of their low permeability (10-19 10-21 m2). To avoid exposition redundancy, an additional description of the technical performance of the triaxial apparatus can be referred to (Brantut et al., 2011, Sarout & Guéguen, 2008). Compressive stresses and compactive strains are denoted as positive. Axial creep deformation was measured using three capacitive gap sensors that externally monitored the overall axial displacement of the piston during creep deformation. Volumetric strain during creep was estimated by adding the average of axial strains (axial displacement of the piston divided by the sample length) and two average radial strains measured by four radial strain gauges glued uniformly around the cylindrical rock surface. As the deformation rate generally stabilized during the last 8 h in most creep periods (Geng et al., 2018), we estimated the average axial strain rate over the last 8 h of each step to characterize the creep strain rate under the corresponding axial loading stress. More technical details of the sample configuration and creep rates estimation can be found in (Geng et al., 2018).

{"references": ["Geng, Z., Bonnelye, A., Chen, M., Jin, Y., Dick, P., David, C., Fang, X. & Schubnel, A. (2018). Time and Temperature Dependent Creep in Tournemire shale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 123, 9658-9675.", "Brantut, N., Schubnel, A. & Gu\u00e9guen, Y. (2011). Damage and rupture dynamics at the brittle\u2010ductile transition: The case of gypsum. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978\u20132012) 116.", "Sarout, J. & Gu\u00e9guen, Y. (2008). Anisotropy of elastic wave velocities in deformed shales: Part 1\u2014Experimental results. Geophysics 73, D75-D89."]}

The original version of dataset is used for review purposes of an article entitled "Pressure solution compaction during creep deformation of Tournemire shale: implications for temporal sealing in shales".