Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This repository contains materials and data used and described in: Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Santurette, S., Dau, T., Neher, T. (2021). Towards Auditory Profile-based Hearing-aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation. Audiol. Res. 11, no. 1: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11010002 Abstract Background - The clinical characterization of hearing deficits for hearing-aid fitting purposes is typically based on the pure-tone audiogram only. In a previous study, a group of hearing-impaired listeners completed a comprehensive test battery designed to tap into different dimensions of hearing abilities. A data-driven analysis of the data yielded four clinically relevant patient subpopulations or “auditory profiles”. The purpose of the current study was to propose and pilot-test profile-based hearing-aid settings to explore their potential for providing more targeted hearing-aid treatment. Methods - Four candidate hearing-aid settings were developed and evaluated by a subset of the participants tested previously. The evaluation consisted of multi-comparison preference ratings carried out in realistic sound scenarios. Results - Listeners belonging to the different auditory profiles showed different patterns of preference for the tested hearing-aid settings that were largely consistent with the expectations. Conclusion - The results of this pilot evaluation support further investigations into stratified, profile-based hearing-aid fitting with wearable hearing aids. Please cite this article when using the data Description of the files: APBHAF_Audiofiles.zip: Audio files used in the SenseLabOnline environment. Each folder corresponds to one participant. APBHAF_MUSHA.xlsx: Raw Data of the MUSHA experiment. APBHAF_MUSHA_Analysis.R: R code for the data analysis. MUS_SoundScenes.mat: Mat file with a structure 1x9 MUS with the raw acoustic signals before processing with the hearing-aid simulator. CurrentMixture: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right. CurrentAnchor: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right. The Anchor is -6 dB SNR. SampleLabel: Either "Kantine", "Traffic" or "Quiet" ConditionLabel: Either "Cond1", "Cond2" or "Cond3" fsmix: sampling frequency. For all signals must be 32000Hz MUSHA_Instruction: Instructions used for explaining the task and the environment. * The participant IDs in each of the files has been assigned randomly to ensure the anonymization of the data. The pseudo-anonymized data might be shared under request by direct correspondence with the authors.
{"references": ["SenseLab dept. (2017). SenseLabOnline (version 4.0.2). Listening test software. H\u00f8rsholm, Denmark: FORCE Technology.", "Baker, R., & Hazan, V. (2011). DiapixUK: task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 761\u2013770. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0075-y", "S\u00f8rensen, A. J., Fereczkowski, M., & MacDonald, E. N. (2018, March 21). Task dialog by native-Danish talkers in Danish and English in both quiet and noise. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1204951", "Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Bianchi, F., Piechowiak, T., Hau, O., Pedersen, M. S., \u2026 Santurette, S. (2018). Technical evaluation of hearing-aid fitting parameters for different auditory profiles. Euronoise 2018, 381\u2013388. Retrieved from http://www.euronoise2018.eu/docs/papers/66_Euronoise2018.pdf", "Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Neher, T., Santurette, S., & Dau, T. (2020). Robust data-driven auditory profiling for precision audiology. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.05.20036442"]}
sensory evaluation, audiology, hearing aid
sensory evaluation, audiology, hearing aid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts