Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Augochlora Smith 1853

Authors: Lepeco, Anderson; Gonçalves, Rodrigo Barbosa;

Augochlora Smith 1853

Abstract

Key to Augochlora species of Southern South America (Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazilian states of Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, and Santa Catarina) Additional figures from previous works may help to visualize many structures mentioned along the key. Microscopy photographs of the pseudopygidial area on T5 can be found in Dalmazzo & Roig-Alsina (2011, Figs. 11 and 12). Labrum basal elevation was illustrated by Eickwort (1969 a, Figs. 153 and 156) and photographed by Lepeco & Gonçalves (2020, Fig. 1). Hypostomal carina was illustrated by Dalmazzo & Roig-Alsina (2011, Fig. 6). Preepisternum and metapostnotum sculpturing was photographed by Lepeco & Gonçalves (2020, Fig. 2). Females 1 Mandible preapical tooth small and rounded, produced far from mandible apex (Fig. 1A); T5 pseudopygidial area covered by scale-like decumbent setae pointing towards midline; blue iridescences usually absent or very faint................................................................................................. 2 (Subgenus Oxystoglossella) - Mandible preapical tooth large and sharp, produced near mandible apex (as in Figs. 1B, C); T5 pseudopygidial area not covered by scale-like setae, colliculate integument exposed; blue iridescences usually present...... 5 (Subgenus Augochlora s. str.) 2(1) S1 with a tuberculate elevation (as in Fig. 1I); hypostomal carina not projected anteriorly; labrum basal elevation slight, not well defined................................................................. Augochlora mendax sp. nov. - S1 without tuberculate elevation (as in Fig. 1H); hypostomal carina projected anteriorly (forming a tooth in A. iphigenia); labrum basal elevation well defined, orbicular or transverse.................................................... 3 3(2) Labrum basal elevation transverse; hypostomal carina forming a tooth anteriorly; preepisternum rugulose; lower paraocular area sparsely punctate (I> PD).................................................. A. iphigenia Holmberg, 1886 - Labrum basal elevation orbicular; hypostomal carina not forming a tooth; preepisternum punctate near pronotal lobe or entirely rugose; lower paraocular area contiguously punctate........................................................ 4 4(3) Preepisternum punctate near pronotal lobe; mesoscutum anterior border not rugulose; metapostnotum posterior surface microreticulate; gena and post gena punctate to weakly striate; metasoma without copper-red reflections.................................................................................................. A. aurinasis (Vachal, 1911) - Preepisternum rugose, without distinct punctures; mesoscutum anterior border rugulose; metapostnotum posterior surface with transversal carinae; gena and post gena strongly striate; metasoma with copper-red reflections.... A. morrae Strand, 1910 5(1) Metasoma with strong copper-red reflections; T3 with tiny setae overlapping apical margin sublaterally; labrum brown to dark brown, basal elevation orbicular........................................................... A. hestia sp. nov. - Metasoma never with copper-red reflections; T3 with tiny setae not reaching apical margin sublaterally; labrum usually black, basal elevation transverse, sometimes not well defined....................................................... 6 6(5) T1 apex not inflexed (as in Fig. 2A), dorsal surface usually with very weak punctures or impunctate; anterior and posterior surfaces of hind coxa ventrally separated by strong angulation; scutellum with a strongly marked medial furrow......... 7 - T1 apex inflexed (curved towards T2 base, as in Fig. 2B), dorsal surface usually with well-defined punctures; anterior and posterior surfaces of hind coxa ventrally separated by a slightly curved area; scutellum medial furrow absent or inconspicuous. .................................................................................................. 10 7(6) Hypostomal carina projected as a tooth anteriorly; S1 without projection (Fig. 1H); head with elongated aspect (as in Figs. 15B and 26C), clypeus usually longer than wide................................................................ 8 - Hypostomal carina not projected anteriorly; S1 with spiniform projection (Figs. 1J, L); head with a more rounded aspect (as in Figs. 7B and 13B), the clypeus not longer than wide......................................................... 9 8(7) Mesoscutum with anterior setae short (length ~ 1 OD); clypeus and supraclypeal area often with darkened spots........................................................................................... A. esox (Vachal, 1911) - Mesoscutum with anterior setae long (length ~ 2 OD); clypeus and supraclypeal area never with darkened spots............................................................................................... A. hirsuta sp. nov. 9(7) Lower paraocular area contiguously punctate, regular sized punctures; outer surface of hind tibia and tarsus with dark setae; scutellum with dark setae; mandible distal part of adductor ridge strongly swollen (Fig. 1B); body usually green with blue iridescences, although entirely blue or black specimens are common.......................... A. daphnis Smith, 1853 - Lower paraocular area with crowded weak punctures among larger piligerous punctures; outer surface of hind tibia and tarsus only with pale setae; mandible distal part of adductor ridge weakly swollen; scutellum without dark setae; body usually green with golden reflections, black specimens are uncommon............................. A. braziliensis (Vachal, 1911) 10(6) Epistomal angle weakly protruding over clypeus; clypeus apex prolonged over apical border; metapostnotum medioapical margin smooth, without carinae; frons slightly protuberant above antennal sockets; overall body and appendices with swollen appearance (as in Fig. 23A, B)............................................................ A. helena sp. nov. - Epistomal angle strongly protruding over clypeus; clypeus apex not prolonged over apical border; metapostnotum medioapical margin carinate to rugulose, never smooth; frons not protuberant above antennal sockets; body and appendages not as above .................................................................................................. 11 11(10) S1 with a spiniform projection (Figs. 1 J–L); mandible medial portion strongly constricted, with about half basal width (Fig. 1C); mid-trochanter ventral margin often swollen (Figs. 1 E–G)............................................... 12 - S1 without a spiniform projection, sometimes with a tuberculate elevation (Figs. 1H, I); mandible medial portion not strongly constricted, minimum width on medial portion between 0.7x and 0.9x basal width (Fig. 1B); mid-trochanter ventral margin not swollen (Fig. 1D)................................................................................... 20 12(11) Mid trochanter expanded ventrally, total width subequal to length (Fig. 1G); sublateral surfaces of T2 marginal area with punctate portion shorter than apical dark band (Fig. 3G), which is usually concave in lateral view; T1 anterior surface always with dense coverage of tomentose setae...................................................................... 13 - Mid trochanter ventral margin variable, but not widely projected (Figs. 1 D–F); sublateral surfaces of T2 marginal area with punctate portion usually as long as or longer than impunctate apical dark band (Fig. 3F), which is never concave in lateral view; T1 anterior surface variable, often without tomentose setae.................................................. 14 13(12) T1 sparsely punctate, apex inflected, but not forming a tubular border (as in Fig. 2B); S1 projection short (as in Fig. 1J); mesoscutum punctation sparser dorsally posterior to median line (I> PD), with a darkened spot; body punctation not coarse; head blue with cyan-green iridescences....................................................... A. atlantica sp. nov. - T1 densely punctate, apex inflexed forming a tubular border; S1 projection long and broad (as in Fig. 1L); mesoscutum densely punctate posterior to median line (I PD, disc usually darkened; metapostnotum longer than metanotum, medioapical margin with transverse carinae.................................................................................................................... A. pyrgo (Schrottky, 1910)

Published as part of Lepeco, Anderson & Gonçalves, Rodrigo Barbosa, 2020, A revision of the bee genus Augochlora Smith (Hymenoptera; Apoidea) in Southern South America, pp. 1-97 in Zootaxa 4897 (1) on pages 6-8, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4897.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4392347

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Augochlora, Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2