Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A STUDY OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION AMONG INPATIENT IN TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.

Authors: Dr. Geetha Jayprakash, Dr. Jagrit Koirala*, Dr. Dipendra Thapa, Dr. Parthasaradhi Reddy, Dr. Peter Kandel, Dr. Shyam Nandan Yadav;

A STUDY OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION AMONG INPATIENT IN TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify Drug-Drug Interaction among the inpatient admitted in ICU and the Medical Ward of a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. METHOD: This study was a prospective observational study conducted over a period of 6 months from July 2016 to January 2017 among inpatients of ICU and Medical Ward. The prescriptions having 2 or more drug and where DDIs was suspected were selected. The drugs in the prescription were analyzed through drug interaction checker software. The DDIs were classified based on the severity of Interactions, mechanism of interaction, the relation of disease and drug interaction, and the total number of drug prescribed were determined. RESULT: There was a total of 225 patients in our study. Out of 225(100%) total patients who had drug-drug interactions, There were a total of 72(32%) patients in ICU and a total of 153(68%) patient in the Medical Ward. An average of 7.625 drugs per prescription was prescribed in ICU and an average of 5.70 drugs per prescription were prescribed in Medical Ward. There were 1333 drug-drug interaction. Among them, 523 DDIs were in ICU and 810 DDIs were in the Medical Ward. A severity assessment showed that in both ICU and Medical ward, majority of interaction were moderate followed by minor interaction. In ICU (57.93%) and in the Medical Ward (62.96%) were moderate drug interaction respectively. On assessing the mechanism of DDIs, pharmacodynamic interaction in ICU were (34.99%) which was higher than pharmacokinetic interaction which was (33.46%) followed by unknown mechanism (31.54%). Whereas in Medical ward most of the interaction was pharmacokinetic Interaction (45.55%) followed by an unknown mechanism (30.74%) and pharmacodynamic interaction (23.70%). Finding of this study showed that cardiovascular disease had (24.28%) and respiratory disease had (18.54%) DDIs in ICU. Similarly, in the Medical Ward cardiovascular disease had (36.79%) and respiratory disease had (23.33%) DDIs. This study result showed that as the number of drug increases in a prescription, the number of DDIs also increases. The management required for DDIs in the study was Dosage adjustment which was 16% followed by monitoring drug level which was 15%. CONCLUSION: A significant number of drug interactions were seen in the prescription of the inpatient of ICU and Medical ward. The most prevailing interaction was Moderate interaction which was the highest number followed by minor interaction. Polypharmacy was the major factor responsible for DDIs. This study highlights the need for intense monitoring of patients to help detect and prevent them from serious health hazards associated with DDIs.

Keywords

Drug Interaction, Severity of Interaction, Mechanism of Interaction, Disease.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 7
    download downloads 50
  • 7
    views
    50
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
7
50
Green
Related to Research communities