Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This data set contains: Full data files of a 2016 review of definitions of Open Peer Review in the scholarly literature in xls and csv formats Description of data collection methodology (txt) Readme file (txt) The term “open peer review” has neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations. Recognising the absence of a consensus view on what OPR is, OpenAIRE has undertaken a systematic review of definitions of “open peer review” or “open review”, to create a corpus of 122 definitions. These definitions have been systematically analysed to build a coherent typology of the many different innovations in peer review signified by the term and hence provide the precise technical definition currently lacking. This quantifiable data offers rich information on the range and extent of differing definitions over time and by broad subject area. Contact: Tony Ross-Hellauer: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-7027 / ross-hellauer@sub.uni-goettingen.de
open peer review, scholarly communications, open science
open peer review, scholarly communications, open science
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 54 | |
| downloads | 52 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts