Views provided by UsageCounts
Rhopaea assimilis Blackburn, 1911 Rhopaea assimilis Blackburn, 1911: 191. Rhodaea assimilis: Lea 1912: xxxvi (in error). Lectotype (here designated) male: Type H. T. (circular red ringed, typeset) | 3270 Bulli [34.30°S, 150.92°E] (red, handwritten) T (handwritten) | Blackburn coll. 1910-236 (typeset) | RHOPAEA assimilis Blackb. (handwritten) | aedeagus dissected out and mounted on card | my lectotype label; in NHML. Blackburn (1911) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of males (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Lea (1912) noted that the ‘type’ had been sent to NHML, and Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” male from Bulli in NHML. Houston & Weir (1992) listed a “ holotype (probable)”. As Britton (1978) and Houston & Weir (1992) provided no discussion and did not label any specimen in NHML, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the male in NHML the lectotype.
Published as part of Allsopp, Peter G., 2020, Clarification of the status of the types of Australian Melolonthini (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae) described before 1950, pp. 451-486 in Zootaxa 4885 (4) on page 478, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4296848
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Rhopaea, Melolonthidae, Animalia, Rhopaea assimilis, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Rhopaea, Melolonthidae, Animalia, Rhopaea assimilis, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts