Views provided by UsageCounts
We explore the caveats of a promising research field, namely neural machine translation, in the context of preserving indigenous languages in Africa. We face the challenge of dealing with low-resource language pairs. Methodically, we employ some literature approaches and frameworks to learn translation models from Bible data in Moore (a major language in Burkina Faso) and French. Our experiments indeed confirm previous findings in the literature that vanilla neural machine translation models are ineffective for low resource language pairs. Surprisingly, however, we also found that we are not able to even remotely match performance recorded by the state of the art adapted methods for low-resource language pair in the literature. Nevertheless, although word alignment, Byte Pair Encoding and Adam optimization did not successfully bring reasonable performance, we note that there are many remaining insightful approaches for low-resource language pairs.
Neural machine translation, Natural language processing, machine translate, Deep learning, Low resource language pairs, Transfer learning, Indigenous languages
Neural machine translation, Natural language processing, machine translate, Deep learning, Low resource language pairs, Transfer learning, Indigenous languages
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts