Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Harmonisation of data is largely a manual process. Although there are naming conventions that are embedded in many studies (especially panel studies), that can provide strong clues to the equivalence of variables, it is by no means perfect and requires a priori knowledge. The capture of questions (in DDI-Lifecycle instruments) linked to the output variables, allows generic methods to be developed to reliably identify and organise variables which may be candidates for harmonisation. The presentation will discuss the approach CLOSER has taken to develop user facing tools that allows researchers to determine the criteria they wish to apply to harmonising variables, these include, the question, response domain, mode, and study characteristics. Recorded version of the whole session: https://youtu.be/mBJhJPGM60g
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts