Downloads provided by UsageCounts
There are various mathematical tools available to measure the level of accuracy such as Crisp, Fuzzy, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets and Neutosophic set. Further, Plithogenic set is a generalization of these four sets. This paper aims to test whether Plithogenic aggregation operation is more effective than other sets in its accuracy, while decision making. In order to obtain a better accuracy, the Plithogenic aggregation operation such as Fuzzy set [FS], Intuitionistic fuzzy set [IFS] and Neutrosophic set [NS] used tnorm and tconorm. An illustration is examined in this paper to prove the result of better accuracy using plithogenic aggregation operators in decision making.
plithogenic operators, fuzzy union, intersection operators, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA1-939, t-norm, QA75.5-76.95, t-conorm, Mathematics
plithogenic operators, fuzzy union, intersection operators, Electronic computers. Computer science, QA1-939, t-norm, QA75.5-76.95, t-conorm, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 20 | |
| downloads | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts