Views provided by UsageCounts
This is the raw data set for the paper "The EMPATHIC Framework for Task Learning from Implicit Human Feedback", published at CoRL 2020. (project website) The data set contains human facial reactions recorded while the subjects watching autonomous agents completing a task that determines their reward. This data set contains data recorded in two domains: Robotaxi and RoboticSortingTask (details of each domain can be found in the paper). This data set file is organized as: RobotaxiData/: subject_id/ episode_N/ [subject_id]_episode_N_[time]_[time_step]_[frame_id].jpg RLstatistics_episode_N.csv: time_step, reward, optimality RoboticSortingTaskData/ subject_id/ [subject_id]_[trajectory_order]_[trajectory_id] trajectory_returns.csv: trajectory_id, final_return If you find this data set useful for your research, please consider citing our paper: @inproceedings{cui2020empathic, title={The EMPATHIC Framework for Task Learning from Implicit Human Feedback}, author={Cui, Yuchen and Zhang, Qiping and Allievi, Alessandro and Stone, Peter and Niekum, Scott and Knox, W Bradley}, booktitle={Conference on Robot Learning}, year={2020}, organization={PMLR} }
Human Robot Interaction, Facial Reactions, Interactive Learning
Human Robot Interaction, Facial Reactions, Interactive Learning
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 37 |

Views provided by UsageCounts