Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/he...
Other literature type . 2020
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/yk...
Other literature type . 2020
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Évaluation de la performance des incubateurs d'entreprises : Vers une revue de littérature systématique

تقييم أداء حاضنة الأعمال: نحو مراجعة منهجية للأدبيات
Authors: Abdelouahed Jittou; Razane Chroqui;

Évaluation de la performance des incubateurs d'entreprises : Vers une revue de littérature systématique

Abstract

It is only recently that research focused primarily on the performance of business incubators has gained ground. Identifying the scientific research work dealing with the question of the evaluation of these incubation structures remains a priority. It leads us to an understanding of the different factors of relevance and success of the incubated companies than the incubators themselves. That is to say, it is not possible to set successful incubated companies if they are located in incubators that are not. It emphasizes the need to understand the key factors that make an incubator successful. The objective of this research is to assess the current state of the literature concerning the performance factors of business incubators allowing to create a healthy and ideal environment and guaranteeing the success of their incubators. More specifically, this research aimes at providing some answers to the following questions: (a) How is research representented on the performance of incubators (b) What are the most appropriate definitions of incubation; and (c) What are the different performance factors of business incubators. Hence, we conduct a systematic study of previous systematic literature reviews (RLS). We apply several searches (databases, keywords, research questions, selection criterios, etc.) in order to retrieve the related publications, which will then be selected and evaluated. Our results show that current research on business incubator performance factors is in its early stages. This situation calls for an intensification of investigative efforts in the form of a SLR on the different mechanisms of success of these incubators and even for their incubates.

It is only recently that research focused primarily on the performance of business incubators has gained ground. Identifying the scientific research work dealing with the question of the evaluation of these incubation structures remains a priority. It leads us to an understanding of the different factors of relevance and success of the incubated companies than the incubators themselves. That is to say, it is not possible to set successful incubated companies if they are located in incubators that are not. It emphasizes the need to understand the key factors that make a successful incubator. The objective of this research is to assess the current state of the literature concerning the performance factors of business incubators allowing to create a healthy and ideal environment and guaranteeing the success of their incubators. More specifically, this research aims at providing some answers to the following questions: (a) How is research represented on the performance of incubators; (b) What are the most appropriate definitions of incubation; and (c) What are the different performance factors of business incubators. Therefore, we conduct a systematic study of previous systematic literature reviews (RLS). We apply several searches (databases, keywords, research questions, selection criteria, etc.) in order to retrieve the related publications, which will then be selected and evaluated. Our results show that current research on business incubator performance factors is in its early stages. This situation calls for an intensification of investigative efforts in the form of a SLR on the different mechanisms of success of these incubators and even for their incubates.

It is only recently that research focused primarily on the performance of business incubators has gained ground. Identifying the scientific research work dealing with the question of the evaluation of these incubation structures remains a priority. It leads us to an understanding of the different factors of relevance and success of the incubated companies than the incubators themselves. That is to say, it is not possible to set successful incubated companies if they are located in incubators that are not. It emphasizes the need to understand the key factors that make an incubator successful. The objective of this research is to assess the current state of the literature concerning the performance factors of business incubators allowing to create a healthy and ideal environment and guaranteeing the success of their incubators. More specifically, this research aims at providing some answers to the following questions: (a) How is research represented on the performance of incubators (b) What are the most appropriate definitions of incubation; and (c) What are the different performance factors of business incubators. Hence, we conduct a systematic study of previous systematic literature reviews (RLS). We apply several searches (databases, keywords, research questions, selection criteria, etc.) in order to retrieve the related publications, which will then be selected and evaluated. Our results show that current research on business incubator performance factors is in its early stages. This situation calls for an intensification of investigative efforts in the form of a SLR on the different mechanisms of success of these incubators and even for their incubates.

في الآونة الأخيرة فقط، اكتسبت الأبحاث التي تركز بشكل أساسي على أداء حاضنات الأعمال أرضية. يبقى تحديد أعمال البحث العلمي التي تتناول مسألة تقييم هياكل الحضانة هذه أولوية. إنه يقودنا إلى فهم العوامل المختلفة ذات الصلة ونجاح الشركات المحتضنة أكثر من الحاضنات نفسها. وهذا يعني أنه لا يمكن إنشاء شركات حاضنة ناجحة إذا كانت موجودة في حاضنات غير موجودة. ويؤكد على الحاجة إلى فهم العوامل الرئيسية التي تجعل الحاضنة ناجحة. الهدف من هذا البحث هو تقييم الوضع الحالي للأدبيات المتعلقة بعوامل أداء حاضنات الأعمال مما يسمح بخلق بيئة صحية ومثالية وضمان نجاح حاضنات الأعمال الخاصة بها. وبشكل أكثر تحديدًا، يهدف هذا البحث إلى تقديم بعض الإجابات على الأسئلة التالية: (أ) كيف يتم تمثيل البحث على أداء الحاضنات ؛ (ب) ما هي أنسب تعريفات الحضانة؛ و (ج) ما هي عوامل الأداء المختلفة لحاضنات الأعمال. لذلك، نجري دراسة منهجية لمراجعات الأدبيات المنهجية السابقة (RLS). نطبق العديد من عمليات البحث (قواعد البيانات والكلمات الرئيسية وأسئلة البحث ومعايير الاختيار وما إلى ذلك) من أجل استرداد المنشورات ذات الصلة، والتي سيتم اختيارها وتقييمها بعد ذلك. تظهر نتائجنا أن الأبحاث الحالية حول عوامل أداء حاضنات الأعمال في مراحلها الأولى. يستدعي هذا الوضع تكثيف جهود التحقيق في شكل SLR حول الآليات المختلفة لنجاح هذه الحاضنات وحتى حاضناتها.

Related Organizations
Keywords

FOS: Political science, Performance, Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, Social Sciences, Business, Management and Accounting, Venture Capital and Start-Up Financing, incubation, incubés, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Innovation and Economic Growth, revue systématique, facteurs de succès, Political science

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 28
    download downloads 20
  • 28
    views
    20
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
28
20
Green