Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 11588/938020
This upload is associated with the publication: Herrmann, M. and W. Marzocchi (2020). Inconsistencies and Lurking Pitfalls in the Magnitude–Frequency Distribution of High-Resolution Earthquake Catalogs. Seismological Research Letters, 92(2A). doi: 10.1785/0220200337 in which we explore high-resolution earthquake catalogs and analyze whether their magnitude distribution complies with the exponential-like Gutenberg–Richter (GR) relation. (Spoiler: those catalogs do not preserve the exponential-like magnitude distribution, which characterizes ordinary catalogs, toward low magnitudes.) Specificially, we estimate a lower magnitude cutoff, or completeness magnitude, Mc, that complies with the exponential-like distribution of the Gutenberg–Richter relation. Note that an exponential-like distribution above Mc is a necessary and sufficient condition to calculate the b-value of the Gutenberg–Richter relation (otherwise the physical meaning of the b-value becomes questionable). We use the Lilliefors test [Lilliefors 1969]1 as a statistical goodness-of-fit test with the exponential distribution to determine the lowest magnitude cutoff above which the magnitude is exponentially distributed, which we call McLilliefors. In other words, above McLilliefors, the magnitude–frequency distribution is consistent with the exponential-like Gutenberg–Richter relation. The Jupyter notebook demo-Lilliefors-test.ipynb (can also be viewed at nbviewer.jupyter.org to render the interactive plot) demonstrates the principle of our method for one example catalog by making use of the Python code in mc_lilliefors.py (the class McLilliefors). Please find more information, applications, and findings in our paper. The code repository to this upload is located at gitlab.com/marcus.herrmann/mc-lilliefors, which is at a more recent state and may receive further updates in the future. ——————— Footnote [1] Lilliefors, H. W. (1969). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for the Exponential Distribution with Mean Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 387–389. doi: 10.2307/2283748 ——————— Copyright © 2020 Marcus Herrmann · Warner Marzocchi — Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II' Licensed under the European Union Public Licence (EUPL-1.2-or-later), the first European Free/Open Source Software (F/OSS) license. It is available in all official languages of the EU.
{"references": ["Lilliefors (1969). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for the Exponential Distribution with Mean Unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(325), 387\u2013389. doi: 10.2307/2283748"]}
statistical seismology, earthquake statistics, earthquake magnitude, hypothesis testing, earthquake catalog, exponential distribution, Gutenberg-Richter
statistical seismology, earthquake statistics, earthquake magnitude, hypothesis testing, earthquake catalog, exponential distribution, Gutenberg-Richter
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 61 | |
| downloads | 42 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts