Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

2019 EMDataResource Model Metrics Challenge Dataset

Authors: Lawson, Catherine L; Kryshtafovych, Andriy; Adams, Paul D; Afonine, Pavel V; Baker, Matthew L; Barad, Benjamin A; Bond, Paul; +45 Authors

2019 EMDataResource Model Metrics Challenge Dataset

Abstract

This is the full dataset of the 2019 Cryo-EM Map-based Model Metrics Challenge sponsored by EMDataResource (www.emdataresource.org, challenges.emdataresource.org, model-compare.emdataresource.org). The goals of this challenge were (1) to assess the quality of models that can be produced using current modeling software, (2) to check the reproducibility of modeling results from different software developers and users, and (3) compare the performance of current metrics used for evaluation of models. The focus was on near-atomic resolution maps with an innovative twist: three of four target maps formed a resolution series (1.8 to 3.1 Å) from the same specimen and imaging experiment. Tools developed in previous challenges were expanded for managing, visualizing and analyzing the 63 submitted coordinate models, and several new metrics were introduced. File Descriptions: 2019-EMDataResource-Challenge-web.pdf: Archive of News, Goals, Timeline, Targets, Modelling Instructions, Process, FAQ, Submission Instructions, Submission Summary Statistics source from the EMDR Challenges website correlation-images.tar.gz: Pairwise correlation tables for selected metric scores from the EMDR Model Compare website maps.tar.gz: The maps used for Fit-to-Map analyses in the Challenge models.tar.gz: The 63 models submitted by the modelling teams results.tar.gz: The output logs for all of the analysis methods Scores.xlsx: Scores for each model and analysis method, compiled into spreadsheet format targets.tar.gz: The reference models used in the analysis Post submission correction to the web archive PDF document: The full list of EMDataResource members on the model committee is as follows: Cathy Lawson, Andriy Kryshtafovych, Greg Pintilie, Mike Schmid, Helen Berman, Wah Chiu.

EMDataResource is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of General Medical Science, R01GM079429. The following additional grants are acknowledged for participant support. JSR and CW: NIH/ R35GM131883. PDA, PVA, L-WH, JSR, TCT and CW: NIH/P01GM063210. AS: National Science Foundation (NSF)/MCB-1942763 (CAREER), NIH/R01GM095583. The Singharoy team used supercomputing resources of the OLCF at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science at DOE under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725. DKihara: NIH/R01GM123055, NIH/R01GM133840, NSF/DMS1614777, NSF/CMMI1825941, NSF/MCB1925643, NSF/DBI2003635, Purdue Institute of Drug Discovery. JSF: NIH/R01GM123159. MI: Max Planck Society German Research Foundation/IG 109/1-1. ACV: Max Planck Society German Research Foundation /FOR-1805. DKumar: NIH/R37AI36040 and Welch Foundation/Q1279 (PI: BVV Prasad). DS: NSF/DBI2030381. TB, CMP, MW: Medical Research Council MR/N009614/1. APJ, MW: Wellcome Trust 208398/Z/17/Z. KC: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P000517/1. MW: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P000975/1.

Keywords

model validation, cryo-EM, 3D structure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 60
    download downloads 61
  • 60
    views
    61
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
60
61