Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The aim of this pilot study was to show the potential usefulness of Usenet discussions to future social historians and to explore possible methods for analysing the data. A survey of 42 Usenet newsgroups was made in November 1996 to explore the patterns of information formed by the contributors. The 5541 articles written by 2130 persons were analysed to identify UK participants and topics related to the UK; to measure the frequency of contributions and relate it to their authors' interests; to draw a comparison between moderated and non-moderated groups; and to indicate the most commonly discussed topics, using keywords taken from headers. A content analysis was used to check adherence to a point of netiquette and to find out to what extent two selected themes (the forthcoming election and violence in society) occupied the minds of contributors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts