Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
downloadFull-Text
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Pedagogical Document...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Pedagogical Documents (peDOCS)
Part of book or chapter of book . 2002
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.de
Full-Text: https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2020/18249/pdf/Deutsche_Suchmaschinen_im_Vergleich_A.pdf
Data sources: Pedagogical Documents (peDOCS)
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.25657/02...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2002
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.de
Data sources: Datacite
DBLP
Conference object . 2021
Data sources: DBLP
 View all 5 versions
Claim

Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich. AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Conference object 01 Jan 2002 German Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Griesbaum, Joachim; Rittberger, Marc; Bekavac, Bernhard;

doi: 10.25657/02:18249 , 10.5281/zenodo.4136653 , 10.5281/zenodo.4136652

Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich. AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de und Lycos.de

Abstract

Die vier Suchmaschinen AltaVista.de, Fireball.de, Google.de undLycos. de werden einem Retrievaltest unterzogen, um ihre Eignung fürden deutschsprachigen Suchraum zu betrachten. Die Evaluierungerfolgt mit 28 Studierenden und Mitarbeitern derInformationswissenschaft und insgesamt 56 Suchfragen im Januar2002. Es zeigen sich deutliche Vorteile für Google.de gegenüber denanderen Suchmaschinen. Die sichtbaren Vorteile von Lycos.dekönnen den statistischen Überprüfungen nicht standhalten, so dassbei den anderen drei Suchmaschinen von einer gleich hohen Retrievalleistung ausgegangen werden muss. (DIPF/Orig.)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Internet, Qualität, Recherche, Performance potential, Quality, Suchmaschine, Leistungsfähigkeit, Germany, Information Retrieval, Vergleichen, Search engines, Information retrieval, Evaluation, Deutschland

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 13
    download downloads 248
  • 13
    views
    248
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
13
248
Green