Views provided by UsageCounts
To generate a collection of putative enhancer regions, we collected all transcription factor ChIP-seq peaks from ReMap 2018 (ref remap; http://remap.univ-amu.fr/storage/remap2018/hg38/MACS/remap2018_all_macs2_hg38_v1_2.bed.gz). We took the summit of all peaks and extended these 25 bp up- and downstream. Based on this file, we generated a coverage bedGraph using bedtools genomecov. We performed peak calling on this bedGraph file using bdgpeakcall from MACS2 2.2.7.1, with the following settings: l=50 and g=10. We performed the peak calling twice, setting c to 4 and 30, respectively. All peaks from c=30 were combined with all peaks of c=4 that did not overlap with the peaks of c=30. We then removed all regions on chrM and extended the summit of the peaks 100 bp up- and downstream to generate a final collection of 1,268,775 putative enhancers of 200 bp.
ChIP-seq, enhancers, hg38
ChIP-seq, enhancers, hg38
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 24 |

Views provided by UsageCounts