Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Increased amounts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) such as TiO2 and CeO2 are being released into soils and sediments, increasing the need for detection and quantification of these ENMs. However, Ti- and Ce-rich particles are naturally present in soils and sediments at concentrations typically much higher than the estimated ENM concentrations. Therefore, a precise knowledge of the properties of natural nanomaterials (NNMs) is a prerequisite to develop strategies to detect ENMs in environmental systems. Characterization of the physicochemical properties of NNMs and ENMs is often complicated by their heteroaggregation and interaction with larger particles. This study evaluates six different extractants for soil NNM extraction in term of recovery and disaggregation to primary particles. The extracted NNMs were characterized for hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential by dynamic light scattering, size-based elemental distribution by field flow fractionation coupled with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy, and morphology by transmission electron microscopy. The extracted NNM concentrations increased following the order CH3COOH-NaCl-ultrapure water (UPW) < UPW ~ NaCl-UPW < Na2CO3 < Na4P2O7 < NaCl-Na4P2O7. Na4P2O7 was the most efficient extractant which resulted in the release of primary NNMs from microaggregates. Although sodium carbonate extracted relatively high NNM concentrations, the extracted NNMs occur mainly as aggregates of primary NNMs. Ultrapure water, sodium chloride and acetic acid resulted in poor NNMs extraction and broad size distributions. Elemental ratios illustrate that Ti is associated with Nb, Ta, and V and that Ce is associated with the rare earth elements (e.g., La, Eu, Y, Ho, Er, Tm, and Yb). The findings of this study provide key properties of NNMs (e.g., size, size distribution and elemental ratios) that can be used as fingerprints to differentiate ENMs (e.g., TiO2 and CeO2) from NNMs in complex environmental media.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts